Friday, February 11, 2011

Finance Committee Budget Hearings – Feb. 10, 2011

Exploring ways to reduce the number of layoffs.

The first public hearing on the proposed budget where members of the public could testify was held the evening before at the Maybrook Court House in Maywood. Employees who are union members turned out in force to protest the layoffs called for in this proposed budget. Commissioners were clearly affected by what they heard the prior evening. Finance Committee Chairman Daley brought Jonathan Rothstein, interim director of Human Relations, to this budget review meeting to update Commissioners on talks with unions about the possibility of unions accepting furloughs or other ideas to reduce the number of layoffs necessary. Mr. Rothstein indicated that no firm proposal had been put on the table, but when the subject had been brought up with at least some of the unions, it was indicated that this was not worth pursuing. However, Chairman Daley urged both Mr. Rothstein and the President's office and the unions to talk again to explore any and all ideas, including pay freezes and unpaid holidays. Commissioner Reyes stated that he was going to introduce an amendment to the budget that would reduce the salaries of department heads by 10% in order to free up money to reduce the number of layoffs.

Bureau of Administration

This Bureau is composed of a great variety of departments, the largest being the Highway Department, but also including the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer (which works on projects that often cut across departmental lines), the Department of Environmental Control, the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Medical Examiner (i.e., the county coroner), the Office of Adoption and Child Custody Advocacy, the Veteran's Assistance Commission, the Animal Control Department, and the Cook County Law Library.

The majority of the questioning was directed to the budget of the Highway Department which calls for a net decrease of 74 FTEs, many of them union positions. An additional 36 positions were saved by transferring their costs to the Special Purpose Fund MFT Illinois First, which gets money from the State for the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of highways. In response to Commissioner questions, the Superintendent of the Department confirmed that he had conferred with the Illinois Dept. of Transportation to make sure the employees transferred qualified under this Special Purpose Fund.

As the Commissioners had done with the Facilities Department earlier in the week, several Commissioners pressed the Superintendent as to whether there were sufficient positions in the budget to be able to do the necessary work of the department, particularly during times like the recent blizzard. He said that there were, but also said that the department would be at a bare bone level, and he would prefer to have a cushion of 2 or 3 more positions in most of the areas. The Superintendent also said they were looking at how they can improve operations by working across the 5 districts of the department. Commissioner Gainer pressed the superintendent to look at closing down District 3 during the non-winter months (and moving the employees to the other districts) since it sounded like it might only need to be open for the purpose of salting. Several Commissioners brought up the idea of whether employees who were losing positions and were close to retirement could "buy out" in order to bridge their service and benefits.

There was also concern about the staffing of the Medical Examiner's area, and Dr. Jones said that she does not see how she can live with only the $60,000 budgeted for overtime. She also mentioned that several maintenance projects in her department were on hold because of the pending layoffs in the Facilities Department.

The one department that is adding people is Environmental Control, which is adding 2 inspectors and 1 administrative assistant. On average, each inspector brings in about 3 – 4 times his/her salary due to fines levied for violations. In the budget, about $300,000 more in revenues are projected as a result of the proposed addition of inspectors.

-- submitted by Priscilla Mims

No comments: