Monday, November 4, 2013

Department Review Meetings for 2014 Budget: Tuesday, October 22, 2013



Treasurer, Inspector General, and Public Administrator


Treasurer Maria Pappas touted that her office is “almost” totally funded through the Special Purpose Fund of the “Tax Sales, Automation Fund,” which derives its money from user fees for the sale of property with delinquent taxes.  [Note:  $9.6 million of the total Treasurer’s proposed budget of $11.6 million comes from the Special Purpose Fund.  The remaining $2 million comes from the Corporate Fund.]  The Treasurer also reminded the Commissioners that since becoming Treasurer, she has significantly reduced the number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) from 250 to 92 in the proposed budget. 

Much of that reduction is due to the use of technology and the use of banks and other outlets for the payment of property taxes, as well as online payments.  Treasure Pappas said that the web site is getting 325,000 hits per month, and that 120,000 e-mails are being answered automatically.  Under the STOPS program, $165,000 has been returned to taxpayers as being duplicate payments.  The tax sales program is now automated resulting in tax sales taking place in 3 days, rather than 6 weeks.  The Treasurer said that her office is now undertaking a comprehensive scanning project with the expectation that there will be no filing cabinets of paper by 2015.  To accomplish this technological push, her department now has 25 full time IT employees.

Commissioner Suffredin inquired as to whether the Treasurer has been able to resolve the issues of whether the data is correct in the government bodies’ debt disclosure publication from the Treasurer’s office.  The Treasurer stated that her office is now contacting the local government bodies to make sure the numbers are correct.

Independent Inspector General Patrick Blanchard reported that his office is now fully staffed having hired 5 new investigators.  His office will be taking over the investigation of all complaints under the Shakman decree, which prohibits the hiring/firing/promotion of employees for political reasons, once the President’s Office is deemed in substantial compliance.  He will have 5 of the 14 investigators available for investigating such complaints.  About 30% of the office’s time is now being spent on Shakman-related matters.  His office is also doing work for the Forest Preserve (and being paid for that work out of the Forest Preserve’s funds).  He anticipates over 500 complaints (not related to Shakman) being received by his office this year, which are reviewed before opening a formal OIG investigation.  One investigator is located at Stroger Hospital, and that proximity has resulted in additional complaints being filed.  As a result of his office’s investigations, the Procurement Code was amended to require itemized bills with the dates and description of work performed by County contractors. 

The main outstanding issue for the office is its jurisdiction over the departments under the Elected Officers in the County, other than the President and Board of Commissioners.  Commissioner Goslin stated that it was certainly his intent when he voted for the ordinance creating the Office of Inspector General that it would have jurisdiction over all Cook County officials and employees.  The Inspector General said that the Clerk of the Court has accepted the OIG’s jurisdiction, despite the fact that there is an argument that as part of the State’s court system, the Clerk would be exempt. 

Nicholas Gapas, the Public Administrator, explained that his is a State office, but his budget is under the jurisdiction of the County Board.  However, the money for the budget comes solely out of the fees generated by the Public Administrator in administrating the estates of decedents who leave no will or whose named executor is not able to be the administrator.  If there are no known heirs of decedents, their real estate in Cook County escheats to the County.  Mr. Gapas estimates that close to $3 million will come to the County this year due to unknown heirs and revenue and interest for administering estates.  The Public Administrator’s expense budget for 2014 is only $1.1 million.

-- Priscilla Mims, observer  

No comments: