Dealing with Recycling, Bad Deeds, Criminal Justice and Ethics
This very long Cook County Board meeting was at times difficult to follow, even for some commissioners: a lot of switching back and forth between committee meetings, the general board meeting, and the consent calendar. However, several important ordinances/amendments and resolutions were passed, often with lengthy discussion and public testimony.
Recycling: With a close 8-7 vote in favor, a very long amendment (20 pages) to the Solid Waste ordinance was passed. This basically describes a new method of inspections by the County of solid waste and recycling facilities (transfer stations). New fees will be charged to these facilities, reporting requirements are more stringent and frequent, penalties are delineated, and future policies will be formed based on information collected from these facilities. Objections to this ordinance included the additional fees per ton of waste that would be passed on to the taxpayers/users; increased record keeping by owners of the facilities; possible anti-business focus; and the large number of exemptions in Cook County making this ordinance cover only 1/3 of the county. Chicago already has a plan in place to cover this and municipal-owned facilities are exempt. Sponsor Comm. Moore indicated that this ordinance would help encourage recycling and prevent surrounding land from being tainted by waste pollution--particularly in southern Cook County.
Bad Deeds (Unlawful Clouding of Title): Apparently in Cook County it is easier to steal a house than steal a car--according to Karen Yarborough, Recorder of Deeds. It appears that for only a small filing fee, a person can change another person's title of land--their home--and then take it over physically by changing locks on the doors and moving in. Although there is state law prohibiting this, the County Board passed an additional ordinance that would address this problem by invoking thousands of dollars in fines and hopefully make the enforcement against this quicker and more effective. (As an aside, homeowners can sign up with the Recorder of Deed's office to get an alert anytime someone changes their land/home title.)
Criminal Justice: An ordinance amendment and a resolution were both passed with regard to the criminal justice system in Cook County. The first establishes an Advisory Committee to the Justice Advisory Council Department. Members of this non-paid committee (the President or designee, 3 members of the CC Board, 1 law enforcement person, 2 social service people), all appointed by the President, would issue a recommendations report at the end of the year regarding violence prevention, intervention and reduction strategies, and programs. Topics would include gun court, straw purchases of guns, violence with guns. This was deferred until the next board meeting as some discussions about this committee are still ongoing.
The second is a resolution transferring the court-ordered Prisoner Release Order to the President's Office instead of the Sheriff's Office, where it originated. This issue has been in the news quite a bit lately, with controversy over who is in charge of releasing more prisoners from the county jail, which tends to get overcrowded. Objections to this transfer center on whether this process should be under the Judicial branch rather than the President's office. This still needs to be approved by a higher authority (State of Ill., U.S.?) before it can be in effect.
Ethics: Two items that were passed dealt with ethics in Cook County government. The first is an amendment to the procurement code sponsored by Comm. Suffredin requiring employees to report "skullduggery" in the procurement process to the inspector general. The second is a resolution sent to the State General Assembly to include Cook County in the state's Ethics Act. Apparently this was an oversight on the part of the sponsor of the legislation in the General Assembly.
Notes on the processes at the Board meeting: This observer has attended numerous Cook County Board meetings over the past six years and procedures have markedly improved. However, there are still some that make it difficult for the public audience to fully understand what has transpired at the meeting:
1. The League is pleased that public testimony is now a part of all meetings, but during this meeting's public testimony, many commissioners were engaged in side conversations rather than listening to the speakers. Although the commissioners themselves may already know the information, this observer found some valuable viewpoints brought up by some outside speakers.
2. There were many "last minute" substitute amendments that were not available to the audience--even on-line. Because the substitution difference was not explained nor mentioned at the meeting, the public audience did not know what specifics the Board actually passed.
3. Committee reports which contain resolutions and other important content are sometimes passed as a whole without mentioning the particulars. At today's meeting, this lead to passage of a Committee Report without it being obvious what was contained in that report. This is especially difficult for the observer to know when the committee met and passed ordinances, amendments and resolutions just the day before.
This observer hopes some adjustments can be made to help the public better understand and follow the Board Meetings.
No comments:
Post a Comment