Showing posts with label election administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election administration. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Commissioners question Cook County's salary increases while raising taxes and fees

Cook County Committee & Board of Commissioners’ Meeting Wednesday, October 28, 2015


The Board meeting was called to order at 11:15 a.m. but the actual conduct of business started at 1:50 and ended at 2:50.  This writer found the meeting process one of the most confusing observed.  Perhaps it had something to do with the number of budget hearings that Commissioners attended in the days prior to the formal Board Meeting and the inability to get the morning Committee meetings concluded on time.

Major Discussions/Decisions of Note are: 

  1. Resolution #15-4297 passed out of the Finance Committee and was approved by the full Board.  It is a contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield for $884,195,500 over a 3 year period ending in 2018. This covers 22,000 employees and 33,000 dependent lives and includes all Cook County government employees, the Forest Preserve, and the Housing Authority.  By the end of the contract, employees in total will pay for approximately 10% of the total cost of insurance.  Currently the Health and Hospital Systems employees are included in the county’s PPO network but not the HMO.  They are negotiating for the HMO [in competition with HHS’s County Care]. 
  2. Resolution #15-5145 changing the Medical Examiner Ordinance, passed out of the Finance Committee and was approved by the full Board.  In addition to language updates [dropped the anachronistic Office of the Coroner reference], it gave authority to the new Medical Examiner to enter into cooperative agreements with other agencies having laboratory facilities without going to the Board for permission, and changed the accounting method for the fee fund.  The Board did ask for an email notice when entering into agreements.
  3. Resolution #15-6190, proposed by Commissioner Fritchey, was sent to the Finance Committee.  The resolution calls for a county-wide referendum to abolish the office of the Cook County Recorder of Deeds.  The CC League of Women Voters spoke in favor of sending the resolution to committee to give the public time to review and comment.  We will closely follow this resolution. 
  4. Resolution #15-5847, authorizing the Sheriff’s office to appoint a Cook County Gun Violence Coordinator was passed out of the Criminal Justice Committee and approved by the Board.  
Other Board Business
  1. The CFO of HHS reported that as of the end of the 3rd Q, HHS has $14 million budgeted surplus.  It is waiting for a $100,000 million Federal and State pass through from the State. 
  2. County Clerk David Orr asked for and received a transfer of funds to purchase electronic pollbook computer equipment to serve precincts larger than 1,000 registered voters. 
  3.  State's Attorney, Anita Alvarez, received approval to renew a grant for 2 staff members to work on a uniform bond court screening process thereby allowing for diversion into treatment courts and decreasing the time offenders spend in custody. 
  4. Alvarez also received a 3-year $900,000 Federal grant to strengthen the response to victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking who are enrolled in colleges located in Cook County including Chicago. 

Public Speakers and Consent Calendar Highlights: 

  1. The Board saluted two Chicago officers that save a baby’s life by foregoing protocol and driving the infant directly to the hospital rather than waiting for an ambulance. 
  2. The Rev. Jesse Jackson was honored on his 74th birthday for his civil rights and community work. 
  3. Representatives of the Black Funeral Directors Association requested a reconsideration of the ordinance authorizing a charge of $500 to Funeral Homes that pick up deceased individuals and deliver them to the County Morgue because families cannot pay the funeral home for a burial and the funeral home is not legally able to store bodies.  It was noted that the storage fee was imposed to discourage use of the Medical Examiner’s office which has limited capacity.  Commissioners Boykin and Steele promised to continue to find a solution for the Funeral Directors as they are caught in the middle.  One suggestion is that the family can gift the body to the Anatomical Society and bypass the ME’s office.  Another:  When the individual dies at home, rather than calling a Funeral Director, call the police to pick up the body and deliver it to the morgue.

Finally, there was much discussion on the number of higher than expected salary increase percentages for several individuals and departments.  Several Commissioners asked the HR Department to prepare a list of those employees receiving a salary increase higher than the standard 6.5% combination of cola and step.  It was noted that two individuals received $31,000 and $36,000 respectively and among three individuals the raises totaled more than $200,000. The point was raised because of the recent Sales Tax increase and the proposed increase to the Amusement Tax.

Submitted by:  Diane Edmundson, Observer
Reviewed by:   Laurie Morse, Observer

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Two Election Authorities in Cook County Deal with Similar Issues Including Advent of Election Day Voter Registration in 2016

2016 Cook County Proposed Budget:  County Clerk and Chicago Board of Elections, October 29, 2015

Voter registration and all things having to do with elections within the city of Chicago are administered by the Chicago Board of Elections, while those duties in suburban Cook County come under the Cook County Clerk, who also has responsibility for a number of other functions.  The Board of Elections and County Clerk appeared separately before the County Board of Commissioners to discuss their separate budgets.  Both reported that the proposed 2016 budgets for elections are up only slightly from 2012, the last time there was a Presidential election year, which is the appropriate comparison:  2% for the County Clerk and 2.67% for the Chicago Board of Elections.  The issue of consolidating the two election functions also came up, as did the challenge of implementing election day voter registration for the first time in 2016.

County Clerk, David Orr
Clerk Orr explained that his office brings in $2 million more in fees for the County in connection with the vital records duties than expended in providing those services plus the duties of issuing tax rates, maintaining information on lobbyists, and preparing agendas and publishing and maintaining records for the Cook County Board.  In particular, he mentioned the success of cookcountygenealogy.com which helps people explore their ancestry even as it generates funds for the County.

There is a separate fund and division for elections within the Clerk’s office.  Costs have been held down for elections in part by reducing the number of precincts on election day by over 800 since 2012.  This reduction was made possible by the fact that 30-35% of those voting do so prior to election day, either by using mail ballots or by using early voting.  Clerk Orr urged support for automatic voter registration.  Commissioner Boykin asked what could be done to increase the number of people voting.  Clerk Orr said he supported moving election day to a holiday, such as Veterans’ Day.  The United States is one of only two major democracies not to vote on a holiday or weekend.  Moving elections to a holiday would also have the advantage of making it easier to get election judges – teachers, for example, would be available; and children would not be in schools, which would make it easier to use schools as polling places.  The Chicago Board of Elections supported that during its budget meeting.

Integrity of Mailed In Ballots
Commissioner Schneider, who also heads the Illinois Republican Party, said that he is very comfortable with the procedures in place in the Clerk’s office in dealing with mail-in ballots.  The Commissioner asked that the Clerk details these procedures for those members of the public listening.  The Clerk explained that each envelope is scanned when it comes into the office to get a digital picture of that piece of mail.  It is then locked up.  Shortly before election day, all the envelopes received go through a second pass and are sorted by precinct.  From the initial scan, the office knows how many ballots for each precinct should be there, and this is verified.  The envelopes are then locked up again until election day when the ballots are scanned and counted.

Issue of Consolidating the Two Election Functions
Commissioner Boykin also asked the Clerk his views on consolidating the election functions of the Clerk and the Chicago Board of Elections. Clerk Orr stated that it would save money and he supports it. However, he sees no political will to do consolidation, so he does not spend any of his time on this issue. He did stress that his office and the Chicago Board of Elections regularly consult and work together where possible. Commissioner Sims asked if consolidation were done, how might it be done. Clerk Orr stated that DuPage County has an election board for that county and a new Cook County election board could be created. Alternatively, the duties of the Chicago Board of Elections could be transferred to the Cook County Clerk’s office.

Chicago Board of Elections
No one asked about consolidation during the budget meeting with the Chicago Board of Elections.  However, Marisel Hernandez, one of the 3 members of that Board, opened the meeting stressing that the Board was created in 1885-86 to clean up elections by having this Board barred from contributing or otherwise participating in partisan politics.  Each of these Board members is appointed by the Chief Judge after he receives applications. 

To deal with the election day registration at the precincts, the Chicago Board of Elections is creating a new position of Election Coordinator for each polling place.  Those in this position will need to attend two trainings and pass a test on voter registration.  Also, the Board will be sending a vote by mail application to each registered voter in Chicago in order to make it more convenient, as well as a reminder that vote by mail is an option.  This will hopefully result in more people voting by mail as opposed to going to the polls, thereby making it easier to deal with same day registration.

Commissioner Schneider asked whether Chicago, which paid all the cost of the city elections in 2015, also contributes to the costs of running elections in 2016.  The City pays $14 million for the Chicago Board of Elections in 2016; the County will be paying $17.8 million under the 2016 proposed budget.

Old Equipment
Both election authorities are dealing with aging equipment that is approaching 10 years.  Both hope that new equipment will be available for the 2020 election.  The current equipment was purchased with dollars coming from the Federal government.  There is a huge question as to where the dollars will come from for future purchases.

-- Priscilla Mims, League Observer

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Cook County Board of Commissioners Meeting Wednesday, December 4, 2013



One item from the Finance Committee was to move a proposed resolution by Larry Suffredin-- Creating “Accountability Charges” for Violations of the Shakman Consent Decree-- to the litigation committee.  This resolution would deduct an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total amount assessed for violation of the Shakman Consent Decree from the department’s operating funds and transfer those monies to the Cook County Self Insurance Fund.

One of the new agenda items from the Finance Committee dealt with the authorization of a contract with WestCare Foundation to supply substance abuse and mental health treatment programs for the Department of Corrections.  There was a lot of public testimony against this contract from current employees who fear losing their jobs, impact of wages, and increase in turnover.

Public testimony was given by Sharon Mulruney from Defend the Vote. She expressed concern with party affiliated judges presiding over another party’s voting machines. She stated that this is a clear violation of legal voting systems. The website for Defend the Vote states concerns with election security.

Before the start of the main board meeting, there was a recognition of several local communities and their involvement in Homeland Security. Over 30 people were recognized for their past and current service.

One agenda item dealt with new Time and Attendance Software that will be introduced in the county. Commissioner Daley asked if all separately elected officials would also be part of this new software program. He was told that the software would be converted over to cover all employees. The goal is to move all payroll processing from manual to computerized and improve accuracy and timeliness of payroll processing.

There was a great deal of discussion regarding the annual calendar of the regular cook county board meetings for 2014. Comments from commissioners who felt that there were too few meetings (formerly every 3 weeks in 2013 to 11 total meetings in 2014) included concerns that there may be too few meetings to get the work done and public perception of the how much work the commissioners were doing. Commissioners who supported the smaller schedule commented that the new efficiency of the board meetings allowed for fewer meetings, and Commissioners would be able to get more work done in their own districts.  The resolution approving the shorter meeting agenda was passed 10 to 6 with one commissioner absent.

The highlight of the presentation from John Yonan, Superintendent of the Dept. of Transportation and Highways, was the genuine praise from the commissioners for the work that John has done.  He was praised for his work ethic and ability to work with IDOT, the city, and suburban cook county governments, and coming up with practical solutions.

Submitted by Laura Davis, Palatine Area League of Women Voters

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Nov. 2, 2011 Budget Departmental Budget Meetings

Chicago Board of Election Comissioners; Cook County Board of Commissioners; Independent Inspector General

Chicago Board of Election Commissioners
Under the proposed budget, this Election Board, which has jurisdiction over all elections within the City of Chicago, will receive $17.4 million from the County.  This covers only 4 employees: the Chairman and 2 Election Commissioners, plus the Executive Director.  In addition, the County pays the fees for election judges and other related expenses as set forth in the statute which created the Board.  The rest of the expenses for conducting elections in 2012 (the primary and general elections), including the salaries and benefits for all other employees, will come from the City and amounts to another $14.2 million for a total of $31.6 million.  The City has about 1.4 million voters, about the same as the suburbs in Cook County, which fall under the election jurisdiction of the County Clerk.  Comm. Schneider noted that the Clerk was asking for $24.6 million, and wondered why the City’s Election Board needed $5 million more.  Chairman Landgdon Neal explained that the County Clerk is able to call upon services of other County Departments, while the Election Board had to provide its own IT, purchasing, and legal counsel, etc.  (Not asked or answered was why the Election Board couldn’t look to the City to provide some of the services the Clerk receives from the County.)

Chairman Neal said that in order to compare the 2012 budget, one should look at the last year in which there was a presidential election; namely, 2008.  The 2008 budget was 1% greater, and included $3 million from the Help America to Vote Act.  A chief reason for the reduction for 2012 is that the Election Board intends to reduce the number of precincts by 20%, which amounts to about 500 less precincts.  Because of Early Voting and “no-fault” Absentee Voting, there are fewer people actually voting on election day, which allows this consolidation without creating long lines.  Fewer precincts mean fewer election judges and fewer sites that have to be rented.

The Election Board is not proposing to add any new touch-screen equipment, and, in fact, the company that supplied what both the City and County have, no longer makes that model.

Chairman Neal touted the 2,000 high school and 2,000 college students who have been helping on election day, and he says that no other election authority in the country can boast so high a number of young people participating.

Unlike past years, none of the Commissioners raised the question about cost savings should the election duties of the Chicago Board of Elections and the County Clerk be merged under one entity.

Cook County Board of Commissioners
While this meeting supposedly was to cover the departments of the Secretary to the Board and each of the County Commissioners, only the budget for the Secretary to the Board was discussed.  Surprisingly, several of the Commissioners took this public meeting time to ask the Secretary, Matthew DeLeon, about any changes in procedures as a result of Mr. DeLeon and part of his staff moving to a different floor from where the Commissioners have their offices. 

The other main area of questions was directed to the two new positions for legal counsel and administrative assistant called for in the budget.  Many of the Commissioners seemed to have forgotten that they had voted to amend the 2011 budget to add these 3 positions.  This was done in the late hours of the day prior to final passage of the budget, which is why the Commissioners may have forgotten about it.  Another reason may be that the positions have still not been filled.  This is due to the fact that they would be exempt from the Shakman decree (which prohibits the hiring and firing based on politics) and so the County had to seek court approval for the positions before filling them.  There were some questions about the need for these positions and whether they could be eliminated in order to provide some money for salary increases for Commissioners staff whose salaries are proposed to be frozen from 2011.

Mr. DeLeon stated that new cameras for the Board room were being purchased that should allow Board and Committee meetings to be broadcast live on the County’s web site.  Commissioners Suffredin, Tobolski and Silvestri all suggested additional equipment, such as tote boards (for recording votes), screens and projection equipment so the audience in the room (and watching on Channel 900 or on the web) could better follow what is occurring.  This is an issue the League recently raised with Commissioners in letters to all and meetings with many of them.

Even though there was no discussion about the Commissioners’ budgets, which the President is recommending be kept at $360,000 for each (same as that in 2011), this observer noted that the President is also recommending that the number of FTEs for Commissioners Collins (1st) Steele (2nd), Murphy (6th), and Gorman (17th) be reduced to 1 (just themselves and no staff).  I verified with Commissioner Tobolski that this is not a typo in the budget book.  Expect this to change, but obviously, the President was sending a message.

Independent Inspector General
Patrick Blanchard, the Independent Inspector General, has one of the few areas where the number of employees and overall budget is proposed to be increased.  He explained that his office is dealing with an increase of about 10% in complaints, and he expects to add 2 more people to deal with Shakman decree-related oversight.  He stated that he expects that the Federal Court to find that the County and Forest Preserve District (which his office is also dealing with through an inter-governmental agreement) and Recorder of Deeds’ office to be in compliance with the Shakman Decree in 2012, in part because of the oversight to be provided by his office.  If so, the County will save significant money being paid to the Court-appointed compliance officers and other related costs.  (Note that the Sheriff’s office, the other area in the County that had been under court oversight, has been found to be in compliance by the Court earlier this year.)

Comm. Beavers questioned Mr. Blanchard about his investigation into the $90 million error in the County’s 2010 Annual Report.  Mr. Blanchard stated that there were numerous factors which resulted in the error and it was not appropriate to put the blame on a single person.  Comm. Beavers stated that he thought the President had done just that by firing two people, including the prior Comptroller.

-- reported by Priscilla Mims

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Finance Committee Budget Hearings – Feb. 4, 2011

Understanding that budget cuts mean people cuts and other implications.

The Finance Committee, which is comprised of all Commissioners, began its series of meetings with all the departments and elected officials of Cook County government to review the proposed budget presented by President Preckwinkle on Feb. 1. Because of the change in Presidents, this proposed budget was presented much later than normal, but it still must be finalized by Feb. 28. As a result, the review is being severely compressed.

Note that one important change from past budget books is the inclusion of information pertaining to grants and full time equivalent (FTE) positions paid by grants under the appropriate departments. In the past, the grant information was segregated separately and FTE positions were not included in totals, making it much more difficult to review and consider. The League has raised this as a transparency issue with county personnel in the past, and so this change in presentation is welcomed.

Bureau of Finance

The County's new Chief Financial officer, Tariq Malhance, did a quick overview of the entire budget and then presented his budget.

Overall, there is a 2% reduction in operating costs from last year ($3.007 billion vs. $3.057 billion in 2010) and a reduction of 1,795 FTE (Full Time Equivalent employee) positions. Much of these reductions is driven by the reduction in the county's sales tax (a loss of $161 million) and a rise in the costs of salaries, pensions and benefits. There were a number of questions by Commissioner Collins trying to understand the underlying assumptions for the budget. In particular, she seemed to be questioning whether the projected revenues were too low.

In contrast to Facilities Management (see below), the Commissioners did not focus on the reduction of FTEs in the Bureau (down by 40, or about 1 in every 4.5 FTE positions). The Revenue area is restructuring to focus on delinquent payers, particularly the cigarette tax. The Comptroller talked about doing more with less, increasing the use of automation, and expects to be able to issue the 2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report by May 31, far earlier than has been done previously. Commissioner Suffredin suggested that if the county had the same definitions for the County amusement tax as are used for the Chicago tax, that might make it easier to partner with the city to do audits and eliminate some contested payments. Commissioner Silvestri suggested also looking at partnering with suburban communities.

Commissioner Gainer asked whether it would make sense to have a risk manager in the Sheriff's department. Lisa Walik, the Bureau's Risk Manager, said that having a risk manager at the Health & Hospitals System has worked well, so she thought having one in the Sheriff's department would also be a good idea.

Facilities Management

James D'Amico, the Director, said that his department had complied with the President's directive to cut the budget by 16%. As a result, the budget is $5.36 million less than in 2010 with 117.4 fewer FTEs, or more than 1 in 4 employees. Mr. D'Amico said that in order to reach the target % budget reduction, more employees have to be let go because of the increase in salaries for employees in that department approved by the Board last year.

Having fewer employees means that his department will no longer be able to rebuild spaces for departments, and he stated that his department can no longer bear the cost of repairing damage caused by vandalism in the County Jail or the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center. He also stated that he believes that if the costs of repairs (amounting to about $2.5 million) done by Facilities Management are borne by those areas, they would have the incentive to take steps to see that the vandalism was reduced. Mr. D'Amico also suggested a way for the County to obtain new revenues would be to charge for parking, as is done at the garage at the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center. There is a $2/day charge (or $25 for a monthly pass). He stated that charging at other County garages (such as at the Criminal Courts building) would produce $2.5 million. (If charge more than $2, the city tax of over $1 kicks in, which means that County would have to charge quite a bit more to get more than $2.)

Several Commissioners raised concerns about entire classes of employees being let go, such as Laborers and Pipe Coverers. There are plans to use outside contractors when needed, but the costs for them will likely be almost double that of employees. Mr. D'Amico said that he looked at areas where there would be less demand for services in the future, where performance was not at national standards, and where outside contractors where already being used. Commissioners continued to be concerned as to whether this budget has sufficient money for the entire fiscal year 2011.

Chicago Board of Elections

Because the only elections in 2011 under this Board's supervision are limited to city elections, the Chicago budget picks up all the costs this year except for the salaries of the three appointed members of the Board of Elections and the Executive Director, which are in this budget.

Bureau of Economic Development

This is a new bureau that is made up of Planning & Development, Capital Planning, Building & Zoning, and P.O.E.T. (the latter which is totally funded by the Federal Govt. and which has been in the news for problems). The capital budget (which last year was $519 million) is not being presented with this proposed operating budget. A complete review of capital projects is being undertaken, and the department expects to present a proposed capital budget in a couple of months. The Building and Zoning department covers unincorporated Cook County. P.O.E.T. has a new head and will be renamed and restructured to improve its effectiveness.

-- Submitted by Priscilla Mims

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

CC Finance Committee Meeting on Proposed 2010 Budget, October 28, 2009: Cook County Clerk

The Cook County Clerk's Office budget is less than 2008 for elections due to consolidation of precincts in suburban Cook County. The corporate fund request is down due to the Clerk’s office taking over the handling of birth and death records from the City of Chicago, which results in additional fee revenues that more than cover the proposed increase in expenditures. The Clerk also touted that the “genealogy online” feature of the Clerk’s web site is very popular. And there is another new feature on the web site where property tax payers whose parcels are in a TIF (Tax Increment Financing) district will be able to type in their pin numbers and find out how much of their property taxes are going into the TIF district. The Clerk’s office keeps track of all 430/440 TIF districts since this office is responsible for determining the EAV (equalized assessed valuation) for each taxing district and then calculating the tax rate for each district. Out of 1.8 million parcels, about 200,000 are in TIF districts.


Upon being questioned, Cook County Clerk David Orr stated that he favored consolidating the election functions of his office and the Chicago Board of Elections (whether under his office or a separate board) because it would make things less confusing for voters and it would save money.


--Submitted by Observer Pris Mims